45
U.S. FDA
right page (45) of AX72 Pegasus-DTC, FUG, us-en A31008-H2860-A1-1-7619 (04.10.2005, 16:00)
© Siemens AG 2004, E:\Auftrag\Siemens\MobilePhones\FCCs\ax72\FUG\am_FDA.FM
VAR Language: en; VAR issue date: 050307
ensure a coordinated effort at the federal
level. These agencies are:
• National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Federal Communications Commission
• Occupational Health and Safety Admin-
istration
• National Telecommunications and In-
formation Administration
The National Institutes of Health also par-
ticipates in this group.
In the absence of conclusive information
about any possible risk, what can concerned
individuals do?
If there is a risk from these products – and
at this point we do not know that there is
– it is probably very small. But if people
are concerned about avoiding even po-
tential risks, there are simple steps they
can take to do so. For example, time is a
key factor in how much exposure a per-
son receives. Those persons who spend
long periods of time on their hand-held
mobile phones could consider holding
lengthy conversations on conventional
phones and reserving the hand-held
models for shorter conversations or for
situations when other types of phones
are not available.
People who must conduct extended con-
versations in their cars every day could
switch to a type of mobile phone that
places more distance between their bod-
ies and the source of the RF, since the
exposure level drops off dramatically with
distance. For example, they could
switch to:
• a mobile phone in which the antenna is
located outside the vehicle,
• a hand-held phone with a built-in an-
tenna connected to a different antenna
mounted on the outside of the car or
built into a separate package, or
• a headset with a remote antenna to a
mobile phone carried at the waist.
Where can I find additional information?
For additional information, see the fol-
lowing websites:
• Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) RF Safety Program (select “Infor-
mation on Human Exposure to RF
Fields from Cellular and PCS Radio
Transmitters”):
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety
• World Health Organization (WHO)
International Commission on Non-Ion-
izing Radiation Protection (select Qs &
As):
http://www.who.int/emf
• United Kingdom, National Radiological
Protection Board:
http://www.nrpb.org.uk
• Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association (CTIA):
http://www.wow-com.com
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) Center for devices and Radiolog-
ical Health:
http://www.fda.gov/cdhr/consumer/
1
Muscat et al. Epidemiological Study of Cellular
Telephone Use and Malignant Brain Tumors. In:
State of the Science Symposium; 1999 June 20;
Long Beach, California.
2
Tice et al. Tests of mobile phone signals for activ-
ity in genotoxicity and other laboratory assays. In:
Annual Meeting of the Environmental Mutagen So-
ciety; March 29, 1999, Washington, DC; and per-
sonal communication, unpublished results.
3
Preece, AW, Iwi, G, Davies-Smith, A, Wesnes, K,
Butler, S, Lim, E, and Varey, A. Effect of a 915-
MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive
function in man. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., April 8, 1999.
4
Hardell, L, Nasman, A, Pahlson, A, Hallquist, A
and Mild, KH. Use of cellular telephones and the
risk for brain tumors; a case-control study. Int. J.
Oncol, 15: 113-116, 1999.
To Next Page
Loading...
Need help?
General
