27
Recommended use for different video formats
Aliasing present. Not very clean. Passable for You Tube.
Looks great but why don´t use 1080/60-50fps/Wide instead.
Jagged edges and some aliasing present. Good for You Tube.
No aliasing. No lens distortion. Clean. Doesn´t look like a Gopro. Very
good for web. You´ll note the softness of the Narrow FOV.
Like with 720/120-100fps/Wide, jagged edges at full resolution.
One of the cleanest modes. In low light looks much sharper than 60fps.
Looks the same as 2.7K/30-25fps/Wide scaled down.
Slightly softer than 30fps. Reduced rolling shutter. Great for movement
and action. Switch to 30-25-24fps with low light to get a sharper image.
Very good. Very clean. Less lens distortion. Doesn´t look like Gopro.
Switch to 30-25-24fps with low light to get a sharper image.
Still clean but softer and with some “artefacts”. Doesn´t look like Gopro,
no lens distortion. Noise can be an issue with low light.
Very sharp and clean. Good POV feeling. Aspect ratio 4:3
Some aliasing and jagged edges. Looks good converted to 1080 or 720.
Excellent. Very sharp. Some rolling shutter. Nice image blur if the
camera is steady. Very good with low light.
Same as 2.7K/30-25fps/Wide but at 24fps and top and bottom cut off.
Good for Time-Lapse (converting to 30/24/25fps in post) with Protune and
fixed White Balance (two things the Time-lapse mode cannot do)
Same as 4K/15fps/Wide but lower frame rate and top and bottom cut off.
Good for Time-Lapse too.
Personal recommendations based on field work.
Source: http://abekislevitz.com
To Next Page
Loading...
