A Series Active Monitor Speakers
E4/38 Service Date printed: 29.02.00
4.6.4 Quasi-Anechoic Measurements and Low-Frequency Limitations
Other techniques exist which provide measurement capability similar to
maximum length sequence analysis. These include Time Delay Spectrometry
(TDS) and impulse testing. They all provide quasi-anechoic frequency re-
sponse measurements of the loudspeaker alone, unaffected by room reflec-
tions. All share the limitation that this anechoic response is useful only
above a critical frequency determined by the physical dimensions of the test
environment. In the illustration below, for example, the direct signal arrives
2.91 ms after it leaves the loudspeaker and the first reflection arrives 9.2 ms
after leaving the speaker. An anechoic measurement, by any of these tech-
niques, must ignore reflections and therefore can only look at about 6.3 ms
of pure first-arrival signal before the first reflection. Meaningful amplitude
measurements cannot be made without acquiring at least one full cycle of
signal, and accurate measurements require several cycles. For the 6.3 ms
example, the frequency corresponding to this time span is about 160 Hz. If
useful frequency response is desired down to 35 Hz, for example, then the
portion of signal to be converted must be a minimum of 1/35 s (28 ms) and
ideally closer to 1/10 s (100 ms). In the example as well as in most realistic
actual rooms, this longer time necessarily includes several reflections and
the response is no longer anechoic.
True anechoic response with even moderate accuracy down to 35 Hz would
require that the first reflection path to be at least 28 ms longer than the di-
rect signal path. This requires a room with the nearest reflecting surface at
least 5 m away. This calls for a room with a 10 m high ceiling with the
speaker and microphone on 5 m tall stands!
Second reflection
(14.8 ms for wall
spaced 2.5 m)
First reflection
(9.2 ms for floor
spaced 1.5 m)
Direct path
(2.91 ms at 1 m spacing)
© Audio Precision™