EasyManua.ls Logo

BRUEL & KJAER 2209 - Relative Humidity; Electrostatic Fields; Magnetic Fields

BRUEL & KJAER 2209
119 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
In
these
records, curve I
is
the
reading
of
the
complete
meter
and micro-
phone. Curve
II
is
the
noise
at
the
microphone
position measured
by
a
stationary
sound level meter. Curve Ill
is
the
complete
meter,
but
with
the
microphone
replaced
by
a
dummy
with
the
same
capacitance
as
the
one
inch microphone,
but
with
negligible acoustic
or
vibration sensitivity. As
is
to
be
expected
the
microphone
is
most
affected
when
the
vibration
is
perpendicular
to
the
diaphragm.
The
noise
from
1 g RMS can
then
amount
to
an equivalent SPL
of
about
88
dB.
5.9. RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
The
microphone
is
unaffected
by
relative
humidity
as long as no
condensation occurs inside it.
For
the
meter as a whole,
the
effect
of
humidity
is
negligible (less
than
0.5 dB)
up
to
90%
RH.
5.10. ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS
The
sensitivity
of
the
microphone
to
an electrostatic field
is
negligible as
long as
the
protection
grid
is
kept
on.
For
the
rest
of
the
meter,
electrostatic
fields have negligible influence.
5.11. MAGNETIC FIELDS
The
effect
of a magnetic field on
the
microphone
and
input
stage
is
negligible. A magnetic field
of
1
0rsted
(80
A/m)
and
50
Hz
produces
an
equivalent S.P.L.
of
36
dB (Lin)
on
the
meter
and
input
stage.
67

Table of Contents

Related product manuals