EasyManua.ls Logo

audioscan verifit - Page 156

audioscan verifit
159 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
Verifit
®
User's Guide Version 4.8 © November 2016
Feigin, J.A., Kopun, J.G., Stelmachowicz, P.G. & Gorga, M.P. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measures of
ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear and Hearing, 10(4), 254-258.
Fikret-Pasa, S. & Revit, L.J. (1992). Three experiments to validate new probe-measurement practices in
prescribing customized hearing aids. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35:384-400.
Freed, D.J., & Soli, S. D (2006). An objective procedure for evaluation of adaptive antifeedback algorithms in
hearing aids. Ear & Hearing, 27(4).
Garolla, L., Scollie, S., & Martinelli, M. (2013). Development of the speech test signal in Brazilian Portuguese
for real ear measurement. International Journal of Audiology, 52(8): 572-576.
Hawkins, D.B., Cooper, W.A., & Thompson, D.J. (1990). Comparisons among SPLs in Real Ears, 2cc and 6cc
couplers. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1:154-161.
Hawkins, D.B., Walden, B.E., Montgomery, A.A., & Prosek, R.A., (1987). Description and validation of an
LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear and Hearing ,8:162-169.
Killion, M.C., Muellar, H.G. (2010). Twenty years later: A NEW Count-The-Dots Method. Hearing Journal,
January, 2010 pp 10-15.
Killion, M. C., & Monser, E. L. (1980). "Corfig: Coupler response for flat insertion gain." In G. A. Studebaker
and I. Hochberg (Eds.),. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Baltimore: University Park
Press.
Lewis, D.E., Feigin, J.A., Karasek, A.E., & Stelmachowicz, P.G. (1991). Evaluation and assessment of FM
systems. Ear and Hearing, 12:268-280.
Martin, H.C., Munro, K.J., & Langer, D.H. (1997). Real-ear to coupler differences in children with grommets.
British Journal of Audiology 31:63-69.
McInerney, C., Tang J., Zelmer, D., & Scollie, S. (2016). Development of a Cantonese Speech Passage for
Hearing Aid Evaluation: Comparison to the International Speech Test Signal. Technical report developed for:
Audioscan. The University of Western Ontario, London, ON.
Moodie, K.S. (1996). A practical approach to hearing aid selection. BSA News 18:6-8.
Moodie, K.S., Seewald, R.C. & Sinclair, S.T. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid
performance in young children. American Journal of Audiology, 3(1), 23-31.
Moore, B.C., Glasberg, B.R. (2004). A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.
Hearing Research, 2004 Feb; 188 (1-2): 70-88.
Moore, BrianC.J.& Glasberg, Brian R. (2004). A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear
hearing loss. HearingResearch, 188 (2004), 70-88.
Mueller, H.G. & Bright, K.E. (1994). Selection and verification of maximum output. In Valente M (ed.):
Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 38-63.
Pavlovic, C. V. (1991). Speech recognition and five articulation indexes Hearing Instruments 42(9):20-23.
Pearsons, K.S., Bennett, R.L., & Fidell, S. (1977). Speech levels in various noise environments, Project Report
On Contract 68 01-2466. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Platz, Rainer, (2004). SNR Advantage, FM Advantage and FM Fitting, Proceedings from the 1st International
FM Conference. www.phonak.com.
Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R.C., Cornelisse, L.E. & Jenstad, L.M. (1998). Validity and repeatability of level-
independent HL to SPL transforms. Ear and Hearing 19(5):407-413.
Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R.C., Moodie, K.S., Dekok, K. (2000). Preferred listening levels of children who use
156

Table of Contents

Related product manuals