Table 4: Number and Percent of Results within BG Values*
CGM Glucose
Level
(mg/dL)
Number of
CGM-Reference
Pairs
Within
±15% /
±15mg/dL
Within
±20% /
±20mg/dL
Within
±30% /
±30mg/dL
Within
±40% /
±40mg/dL
Outside
±40% /
±40mg/dL
Overall 3680 72.8 84.3 95.0 98.0 2.0
40-50 23 47.8 73.9 87.0 95.7 4.3
51-80 288 65.6 77.1 89.6 97.6 2.4
81-180 1722 71.7 82.9 94.7 97.4 2.6
181-300 1193 75.0 87.3 96.2 98.4 1.6
301-400 362 76.8 87.8 97.2 99.2 0.8
401-500 92 78.3 85.9 95.7 98.9 1.1
* Comparison to BG was performed using the FreeStyle Libre Reader’s built-in blood glucose meter. Dierent
performance may be expected when compared to other models of blood glucose meters.
Overall Accuracy against BG values
Accuracy was measured by comparing the absolute relative dierence between the System and BG
values. The absolute relative dierence measures the level of disagreement between the System
and the BG value, but does not tell you whether the System glucose value was, on average, higher
or lower than the BG glucose value. The Mean Absolute Relative Dierence gives an indication of
the average percent disagreement between the CGM and the BG value. Table 5 shows the overall
absolute dierence measure. Overall the Mean Absolute Relative Dierence was 12.1% for the
comparison with BG value. The Median Absolute Relative Dierence shows that half of the time the
System was within 9.4% of the BG value.
Table 5: Dierence Measures with BG Value *
Number of
CGM-Reference Pairs
Median Absolute Relative
Dierence
Mean Absolute Relative
Dierence
3680 9.4% 12.1%
* Comparison to BG was performed using the FreeStyle Libre Reader’s built-in blood glucose meter. Dierent
performance may be expected when compared to other models of blood glucose meters.
111 112
ART38553-101_rev-A_manual.indd 111-112 2/1/18 2:13 PM