EasyManua.ls Logo

Hologic ThinPrep Imager Duo - Page 10

Hologic ThinPrep Imager Duo
230 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
MAN-08723-001 Rev. 001 page 6 of 28
Table 3: Adjudicated Review Versus Imager Review LSIL+ Descriptive Diagnosis
Summary for Each Site and All Sites Combined.
Sensitivity is a percent of “true” LSIL+ (combined LSIL, HSIL, SQ CA and GL CA) slides classified in either study
arm as LSIL+ and specificity is a percent of “true” Non-LSIL+ (combined Negative, ASCUS, AGUS) slides classified
in either study arm as Non-LSIL+.
Sensitivity Specificity
Site/
Number
Cases
Manual
Imager
Difference
Site/
Number
Cases
Manual
Imager
Difference
Site 1
104
84.6%
(76.2, 90.9)
82.7%
(74.0, 89.4)
-1.9%
(-9.5, 5.6)
Site 1
2208
98.7%
(98.1, 99.1)
99.3%
(98.9, 99.6)
+0.6%
(0.1, 1.0)
Site 2
70.4% 72.4% +2.0%
Site 2
99.3% 98.9% -0.4%
98
(60.3, 79.2) (62.5, 81.0) (-6.9, 11.0)
2342
(98.8, 99.6) (98.4, 99.3) (-0.8, .001)
Site 3
77.4% 85.5% +8.1%
Site 3
99.2% 99.5% +0.3%
62
(65.0, 87.1) (74.2, 93.1) (-4.0, 20.1)
2237
(98.7, 99.5) (99.1, 99.8) (-0.1, 0.6)
Site 4
84.7% 78.4% -6.3%
Site 4
98.7% 98.7% -0.08%
111
(98.1, 99.1) (76.6, 90.8) (-14.7, 2.1)
2381
(98.2, .99.2) (98.1, 99.1) (-0.6, 0.4)
All
79.7% 79.2% -0.5%
All
99.0% 99.1% +0.09%
375
(75.3, 83.7) (74.7, 83.2) (-5.0, 4.0)
9168
(98.8, 99.2) (98.9, 99.3) (-0.1, 0.3)
Numbers in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals.
The results presented in Table 3 show that the difference between sensitivities of the Imager Review
and Manual Review arms for LSIL+ for all sites combined was not statistically significant with a
95% confidence interval of –5.0% to +4.0%. The observed difference between sensitivities for
LSIL+ varied among the sites from –6.3% with a 95% confidence interval of (–14.7%; 2.1%) to
+8.1% with a 95% confidence interval of (–4.0%; 20.1%). The difference in specificity results
between the Imager Review and the Manual Review was not statistically significant with a 95%
confidence interval of -0.1% to +0.3%. The observed differences between specificities varied among
the sites from –0.4% to +0.6%.
Table 4: Adjudicated Review Versus Imager Review HSIL+ Descriptive Diagnosis
Summary for Each Site and All Sites Combined.
Sensitivity is a percent of “true” HSIL+ (combined HSIL, SQ CA and GL CA) slides classified in either study arm as
HSIL+ and specificity is a percent of “true” Non-HSIL+ (combined Negative, ASCUS, AGUS, LSIL) slides classified
in either study arm as Non-HSIL+.
Sensitivity Specificity
Site/
Number
Cases
Manual
Imager
Difference
Site/
Number
Cases
Manual
Imager
Difference
Site 1
89.5% 92.1% 2.6%
Site 1
98.8% 99.5% +0.7%
38
(75.2, 97.1) (78.6, 98.3) (-8.9, 14.1)
2274
(98.3, 99.2) (99.1, 99.8) (0.2, 1.2)
Site 2
72.5% 70.0% -2.5%
Site 2
99.8% 99.6% -0.1%
40
(56.1, 85.4) (53.4, 83.4) (-15.4, 10.4)
2400
(99.5, 99.9) (99.2, 99.8) (-0.3, .09)
Site 3
72.7% 86.4% +13.6%
Site 3
99.7% 99.7% 0%
22
(49.8, 89.3) (65.1, 97.1) (-0.7, 28.0)
2277
(99.4, 99.9) (99.4, 99.9) (-0.2, 0.2)
Site 4
61.5% 74.4% +12.8%
Site 4
99.5% 99.8% +0.3%
39
(44.6, 76.6) (57.9, 87.0) (-1.7, 27.4)
2453
(99.2, 99.8) (99.5, 99.9) (-0.003, 0.6)
All
74.1% 79.9% +5.8%
All
99.4 % 99.6% +0.2%
139
(66.0, 81.2) (72.2, 86.2) (-1.1, 12.6)
9404
(99.2, 99.6) (99.5, 99.7) (0.06, 0.4)
Numbers in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals.

Table of Contents

Related product manuals