EasyManuals Logo

OCULUS Pentacam Interpretation Guide

OCULUS Pentacam
216 pages
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Page #204 background imageLoading...
Page #204 background image
202
28 List of illustrations
28 List of illustrations
Figure 1: Sagittal power map of a sphere, r = 8 mm.............................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 2: Snell´s law of refraction................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Figure 3. Refractive power map of a sphere, r = 8 mm.......................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 4: True Net Power map calculated by two spheric surfaces of anterior r = 8mm and posterior r = 6.58 mm......... 9
Figure 5: EKR power map calculated by twospheric surfaces of anterior r = 8mm and posterior r = 6.58 mm................... 10
Figure 6: Calculation of power according to Snell´s law taking the different refractive indices and the different
principal planes of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces into accout.................................................................. 11
Figure 7: Total Corneal Refractive Power map calculated by two spheric surfaces of anterior r = 8mm and posterior
r = 6.58mm and pachiketry........................................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 8: Placido based topography of OD and OS allowing no conclusion regarding keratoconus.........................................15
Figure 9: 4 Maps Selectable showing keratoconus-suspicious elevations in OD............................................................................16
Figure 10: 4 Maps Selectable showing significant elevation in OS...................................................................................................... 17
Figure 11: Placido based topography of OD and OS..................................................................................................................................18
Figure 12: 4 Maps Selectable showing a form fruste keratoconus false-positive topography in OS ........................................ 19
Figure 13: 4 Maps Selectable showing a form fruste keratoconus false-positive topography in OD......................................... 19
Figure 14: Fast Screening Report showing abnormal pachymetry and elevation data with unambiguous signs of
keratoconus in OD........................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 15: Fast Screening Report showing abnormal pachymetry and elevation data with unambiguous signs of
keratoconus in OS............................................................................................................................................................................21
Figure 16: Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (version III) showing keratokonus in OD................................................... 22
Figure 17: Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (version III) showing keratokonus in OS....................................................22
Figure 18: Compare 4 Exams for postoperative monitoring of corneal deturgescence over the course of one month.........23
Figure 19: Fast Screening Report showing the presurgical condition in a case of Fuchs’ dystrophy..........................................24
Figure 20: Fast Screening Report at one month after DMEK surgery...................................................................................................24
Figure 21: Corneal Optical Densitometry showing the presurgical condition in a case of Fuchs’ dystrophy............................25
Figure 22: Corneal Optical Densitometry at one month after DMEK surgery.....................................................................................25
Figure 23: Fast Screening Report showing suspicious values of K Max (anterior surface) and anterior and posterior
elevation.............................................................................................................................................................................................26
Figure 24: 4 Maps Refractive with suspicious curvature and elevation maps of the anterior surface.......................................27
Figure 25: Compare 2 Exams showing changes in anterior surface elevation within a period of one week............................27
Figure 26: 4 Maps Refractive showing with unremarkable elevation maps and curvature map in OD......................................29
Figure 27: 4 Maps Refractive showing unremarkable elevation maps and curvature map in OS................................................29
Figure 28: Corneal Power Distribution showing normal power distribution in OD...........................................................................30
Figure 29: Corneal Power Distribution showing a markedly increased power from 2.0 to 3.0 mm in OS................................. 30
Figure 30: 4 Maps Refractive of OD showing post-LASIK ectasia..........................................................................................................31
Figure 31: 4 Maps Refractive of OS showing post-LASIK ectasia...........................................................................................................32
Figure 32: Pachymetry progression in OD.....................................................................................................................................................32
Figure 33: Pachymetry progression in OS..................................................................................................................................................... 32
Figure 34: Orbscan® incorrencly suggests post-LASIK ectasia................................................................................................................33
Figure 35: 4 Maps Selectable revealing there to be no post-LASIK ectasia........................................................................................34
Figure 36: Orbscan® 4 maps incorrectly suggesting ectasia in OD....................................................................................................... 35
Figure 37: Pentacam® 4 Maps Selectable revealing there to be no post-LASIK ectasia.................................................................35
Figure 38: 4 Maps Refractive revealing a thick cornea..............................................................................................................................36
Figure 39: HRT image..........................................................................................................................................................................................36
Figure 40: HRT image..........................................................................................................................................................................................36
Figure 41: General Overview display showing status in OS prior to YAG laser iridectomy.............................................................37
Figure 42: General Overview display 10 days after YAG laser iridectomy in OS showing improved ACA and ACD values...38
Figure 43: Compare 2 Exams showing changes from before to 10 days after YAG laser iridectomy in OS.............................. 38
Figure 44: Slit lamp gonioscopy pictures showing a narrow angle in all four quadrants...............................................................39
Figure 45: General Overview display showing a low ACV, shallow ACD and narrow angle in OD...............................................40
Figure 46: General Overview display showing a low ACV, shallow ACD and narrow angle in OS............................................... 40
Figure 47: 24-2 Humphrey visual field: full visual field in OD............................................................................................................... 41
Figure 48: 24-2 Humphrey visual field: full visual field in OS................................................................................................................41
Figure 49: Spectral domain OCT showingnormal RNFL thickness in both eyes................................................................................. 41
Figure 50: General Overview display showing a low ACV, shallow ACD and narrow angle in OD...............................................42
Figure 51: General Overview display showing a low ACV, shallow ACD and narrow angle in OS............................................... 43
Figure 52: 24-2 Humphrey visual field showing an early superior arcuate defect in OD...............................................................44

Table of Contents

Other manuals for OCULUS Pentacam

Questions and Answers:

Question and Answer IconNeed help?

Do you have a question about the OCULUS Pentacam and is the answer not in the manual?

OCULUS Pentacam Specifications

General IconGeneral
Measurement TimeLess than 2 seconds
Corneal CoverageUp to 12 mm
SoftwarePentacam Software
Data TransferUSB
Corneal TopographyYes
DisplayExternal monitor required
Measurement PrincipleScheimpflug imaging
CameraRotating Scheimpflug camera
Light SourceBlue LED
PachymetryYes
Anterior Chamber AnalysisYes
Imaging PrincipleScheimpflug imaging
FixationInternal
Power Supply100-240 V, 50/60 Hz
ResolutionHigh resolution
Lens Density MeasurementYes
DimensionsVaries depending on model and configuration
WeightVaries by model, check manufacturer specifications
Number of Images25 or 50

Related product manuals