15-4 Acoustic Output 
15.6  Acoustic Power Control 
A qualified operator may use the system controls to limit the ultrasound output and to adjust the 
quality of the images. There are three categories of system controls relating to output. They are: 
  Controls that have direct effect on the output 
  Controls that indirectly control the output 
  Controls that are receiver controls 
  Direct controls 
It is possible to control, if necessary, the acoustic output with the “A. power” item on the 
screen. In this case, the maximum value of the acoustic output never exceeds an MI of 1.9 
and an I
SPTA.3
 of 720 mW/cm
2
 in any mode of operation. 
  Indirect controls 
The controls that indirectly affect output are the many imaging parameters. These are 
operating modes, frequency, focal point positions, overall depth and PRF. 
The operating mode determines whether the ultrasound beam is scanning or non-scanning. 
Thermal bioeffect is closely connected to M mode, Doppler and Color mode. Acoustic 
attenuation of tissue is directly related to probe frequency. The focal point is related to the 
active aperture of the probe and beam width. For higher PRF (pulse repetition frequency), 
the more output pulses occur over a period of time. 
  Receiver controls 
The receiver controls (for example, gain, dynamic range and image post-processing, etc.) do 
not affect output. These controls should be used, when possible, to improve the image quality 
before using controls that directly or indirectly affect output. 
15.7  Acoustic Output 
15.7.1  Derated Ultrasonic Output Parameters 
In order to determine the relevant Ultrasonic Output Parameters, a method is used which allows 
for the comparison of ultrasound systems which operate at different frequencies and are focused 
at different depths. This approach, called “derating” or “attenuating”, adjusts the acoustic output as 
measured in a water tank to account for the effect of ultrasound propagation through tissue. By 
convention, a specific average intensity attenuation value is used, which corresponds to a loss of 
0.3 dB/cm/MHz. That is, the ultrasound intensity will be reduced by 0.3 dB/MHz for every 
centimeter of travel from the probe. This can be expressed by the following equation: 
)10/3.0(
10
zf
wateratten
c
II
-
 
Where I
atten
 is the attenuated intensity, I
water
 is the intensity measured in a water tank (at distance 
z), fc is the center frequency of the ultrasound wave (as measured in water) and z is the distance 
from the probe. The equation for attenuating pressure values is similar except that the attenuation 
coefficient is 0.15 dB/cm/MHz, or one-half the intensity coefficient. The intensity coefficient is 
double the pressure coefficient because intensity is proportional to the square of pressure. 
The attenuation coefficient chosen, 0.3 dB/cm/MHz, is significantly lower than any specific solid 
tissue in the body. This value was chosen to account for fetal examinations. In early trimester 
ultrasound fetal examinations, there may be a significant fluid path between the probe and the 
fetus, and the attenuation of fluid is very small. Therefore the attenuation coefficient was lowered 
to account for this.