EasyManua.ls Logo

HeartWare HVAD Pump - Page 16

HeartWare HVAD Pump
158 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
12 HVAD® Instructions for Use
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Appendix
Reference
Guides
Alarms and
Emergencies
Patient
Management
Surgical
Implant and
Explant
Monitor
Peripherals
and
Accessories
HVAD
®
Pump Overview
Introduction
1.7 Pivotal US Clinical Study: Bridge-to-Transplant (continued)
Subjects were predominately male (72.1%) and 53.3 ± 10.3 years of age. BSA and BMI were
2.1 ± 0.3 m2 and 28.6 ± 6.1 kg/m2 respectively. The principal etiology of heart failure was
ischemic heart disease (41%) and the average LVEF was 17.8 ± 7.1 %. Pulmonary Capillary
Wedge Pressure (PCWP) was elevated at 23 ± 9 mm Hg and pulmonary artery pressures were


(26 ± 14 mg/dL) and a depressed hematocrit (34 ± 5.8 %).
Eighty percent of subjects in the HeartWare
HVAD
System treatment group were on inotropic
therapy at baseline. Some (23%) were on more than one inotrope. IABP therapy at baseline
was reported for 25% of subjects and 85% presented with an AICD. Subjects received typical
medications for congestive heart failure with diuretics (82%) most common.
Comparison of Selected Baseline Characteristics between Treatment and Control Groups
The mean age of implant recipients in the HeartWare
HVAD
System group was 53.3 (range
22-70) and for the control, 52.2. Other parameters available to compare included gender, BSA,

(Table 1).
Table 1: Select Baseline Characteristics for HVAD and INTERMACS Groups
Effectiveness Results
Primary Endpoint
The analysis of the primary endpoint demonstrated HVAD non-inferiority to the control group
(Table 2). The difference in success rates between the HVAD group and controls was less than
the 15% non-inferiority margin (p <0.0001). The 95% one-sided UCL on the difference in success
rates was 4.5% for the Safety (SAF) population analysis and 0.9% for the Per Protocol (PP)

Characteristics
HeartWare
HVAD
System



p-value
Age (years) 53.3 ± 10.3 52.2 ± 12.2 0.19
Female Gender, n (%) 39 (28%) 120 (24%) 0.36
BSA (m
2
) 2.06 ± 0.28 2.07 ± 0.30 0.59
 25.3 ± 13.5 28.9 ± 20.9 0.94
Right atrial pressure
(mmHg)
10.8 ± 3.3 11.5 ± 5.0 0.53
Serum creatinine
(mg/dL)
1.3 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.6 0.89

Table of Contents