EasyManua.ls Logo

abi 7500 - Page 33

abi 7500
260 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
Chapter 1 Get Started
About Relative Standard Curve and Comparative C
T
Experiments
9
Applied Biosystems 7500/7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System Getting Started Guide for Relative Standard Curve
and Comparative C
T
Experiments
Notes
Relative Standard
Curve vs.
Comparative C
T
Experiments
Consider the following when choosing between relative standard curve and comparative
C
T
experiments:
Comparative C
T
(
∆∆
C
T
)
Experiment
Relative Standard Curve
Experiment
Description
Uses arithmetic formulas to determine
the change in expression of a target in a
sample relative to the same target in a
reference sample. Best for high-
throughput measurements of relative
gene expression of many genes in many
samples.
Uses a standard curve to determine the
change in expression of a target in a
sample relative to the same target in a
reference sample. Best for assays that
have suboptimal PCR efficiency.
Advantage
Relative levels of target in samples
can be determined without the use
of a standard curve, if the PCR
efficiencies of the target and
endogenous control are relatively
equivalent.
Reduced reagent usage.
More space available in the reaction
plate.
Requires the least amount of validation
because the PCR efficiencies of the
target and endogenous control do not
need to be equivalent.
Limitation
Suboptimal (low PCR efficiency)
assays may produce inaccurate
results.
Before you use the comparative C
T
method, Applied Biosystems
recommends that you determine that
the PCR efficiencies for the target
assay and the endogenous control
assay are approximately equal.
A standard curve must be constructed
for each target, which requires more
reagents and more space in the
reaction plate.

Table of Contents