EasyManua.ls Logo

Hologic ThinPrep - Page 22

Hologic ThinPrep
172 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
MAN-05359-001 -001 Rev. 001 page 18 of 32
Table 19. Total Slides Reviewed by Review Type / CT
(% Autoscan = #FOV+FMR / Total # Slides Reviewed over 3 Days)
Sequential Review Batched Review
CT #1 CT #2 CT #3 Overall CT #1 CT #2 CT #3 Overall
Total # slides
reviewed
255 285 300 840 365 340 353 1058
# FOV only
212 179 239 630 308 226 265 799
# FOV+FMR
42 100 37 179 51 109 75 235
# FMR Only
1 6 4 11 6 5 13 24
% Autoscan
Referral
16% 35% 19% 24% 14% 32% 21% 22%
The results are shown in Table 20. The median number of slides screened per day when the
Integrated Imager in Sequential Modality was used for screening and reviewing of slides was
92 slides. CTs using the Integrated Imager in Batched Modality reviewed 86% of the maximum
number of slides that CTs could have reviewed when using TIS.
Table 20. Cytotechnologist Daily Slide Review Rates
# Slides Reviewed
CT Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Daily
Median
Overall Daily
Median
Sequential
Modality
CT #1
87 80 88 87
92
(67%*)
CT #2
90 100 95 95
CT #3
92 108 100 100
Batched
Modality
CT #1
119 123 123 123
119
(86%*)
CT #2
124 106 110 110
CT #3
119 120 114 119
* Percentage with regards to TIS being 100%.
The agreement of the CT diagnosis was compared to the adjudicated results and are shown in
Table 21. High rates of agreement in diagnosis with the adjudicated slide results supports the
clinical utility of this study.

Table of Contents

Related product manuals