EasyManua.ls Logo

Exmark VERTEX V Series - California Proposition 65 Warning Information

Exmark VERTEX V Series
60 pages
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
California Proposition 65 W arning Information
What is this warning?
Y ou ma y see a product for sale that has a w ar ning label lik e the follo wing:
W ARNING: Cancer and R e producti v e Har m—www .p65W ar nings .ca.g o v .
What is Prop 65?
Prop 65 applies to any company operating in Califor nia, selling products in Califor nia, or man ufacturing products that ma y be sold in or brought into Califor nia. It mandates
that the Go v er nor of Califor nia maintain and publish a list of c hemicals kno wn to cause cancer , bir th defects , and/or other re producti v e har m. T he list, whic h is updated
ann ually , includes hundreds of c hemicals found in many ev er y da y items . T he pur pose of Prop 65 is to infor m the public about exposure to these c hemicals .
Prop 65 does not ban the sale of products containing these c hemicals but instead requires w ar nings on any product, product pac kaging, or literature with the product.
Moreo v er , a Prop 65 w ar ning does not mean that a product is in violation of any product safety standards or requirements . In fact, the Califor nia g o v er nment has claried that
a Prop 65 w ar ning “is not the same as a regulator y decision that a product is ‘safe’ or ‘unsafe . ’” Many of these c hemicals ha v e been used in ev er y da y products for years without
documented har m. F or more infor mation, g o to https://oag .ca.g o v/prop65/faqs-view-all .
A Prop 65 w ar ning means that a company has either (1) ev aluated the exposure and has concluded that it ex ceeds the “no signicant risk lev el”; or (2) has c hosen to pro vide a
w ar ning based on its understanding about the presence of a listed c hemical without attempting to ev aluate the exposure .
Does this law apply everywhere?
Prop 65 w ar nings are required under Califor nia la w only . T hese w ar nings are seen throughout Califor nia in a wide rang e of settings , including but not limited to restaurants ,
g rocer y stores , hotels , sc hools , and hospitals , and on a wide v ariety of products . Additionally , some online and mail order retailers pro vide Prop 65 w ar nings on their
w ebsites or in catalogs .
How do the California warnings compare to federal limits?
Prop 65 standards are often more string ent than federal and inter national standards . T here are v arious substances that require a Prop 65 w ar ning at lev els that are far lo w er than
federal action limits . F or example , the Prop 65 standard for w ar nings for lead is 0.5 μg/da y , whic h is w ell belo w the federal and inter national standards .
Why don’t all similar products carry the warning?
Products sold in Califor nia require Prop 65 labelling while similar products sold elsewhere do not.
A company in v olv ed in a Prop 65 la wsuit reac hing a settlement ma y be required to use Prop 65 w ar nings for its products , but other companies making similar
products ma y ha v e no suc h requirement.
T he enforcement of Prop 65 is inconsistent.
Companies ma y elect not to pro vide w ar nings because they conclude that they are not required to do so under Prop 65; a lac k of w ar nings for a product does not mean
that the product is free of listed c hemicals at similar lev els .
Why does Exmark include this warning?
Exmark has c hosen to pro vide consumers with as m uc h infor mation as possible so that they can mak e infor med decisions about the products they buy and use . Exmark
pro vides w ar nings in cer tain cases based on its kno wledg e of the presence of one or more listed c hemicals without ev aluating the lev el of exposure , as not all the listed
c hemicals pro vide exposure limit requirements . W hile the exposure from Exmark products ma y be negligible or w ell within the “no signicant risk” rang e , out of an abundance
of caution, Exmark has elected to pro vide the Prop 65 w ar nings . Moreo v er , if Exmark does not pro vide these w ar nings , it could be sued b y the State of Califor nia or b y
pri v ate par ties seeking to enforce Prop 65 and subject to substantial penalties .
57

Table of Contents

Related product manuals