EasyManua.ls Logo

PreCise PF3400 - Workcell Design and Testing

Default Icon
171 pages
Print Icon
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
Introduction to the Hardware
21
Test Procedure for the PF400
The worst-case crash condition for the PF400 is when the Z axis is moving downwards at the 100%
speed of 500mm/sec and crashes into the relatively non-compliant hand of an operator pinching the hand
into a hard surface. A test setup to measure this force is shown below in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Vertical and Horizontal Test Setup
In this test setup a digital force gage (traceable to NIST standards) is mounted below (or to the left for
horizontal testing) of the gripper of the robot and a “hand compliance simulator” consisting of two plates
separated by compression springs with a compression constant of 75N/mm equal to the compression
constant of a human hand (from figure 2) is attached to the force gage. For the Z test the robot is driven
downwards in the Z direction at various speeds and crashes into the hand simulator attached to the force
gage. For the Horizontal tests the robot is driven horizontally at various speeds into the hand simulator.
A worse case horizontal crash is measured with arm at full extension and J2 (the shoulder) rotating the
arm at various speeds into the force gage. This data is shown under the “J2 rot” column.
A typical case of a robot contacting a person is bumping into the person in free space where the person is
not trapped against a hard surface, or where there is some distance between the person’s appendage
and the hard surface (for the PF400 any distance over 20mm is adequate for the person to stop the robot
with a force less than 40N in the horizontal plane and approximately 60N in the –Z direction.
Figure 5: Free Space Collision Test and Linear Rail Test

Table of Contents

Related product manuals