Interacoustics affinity 2.0 Additional Information

Affinity
2.0
Additional Information Page 136
References
1. Moore BCJ, Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues, 2nd Ed.,
Chichester: Wiley; 2007.
2. Schuknecht HF, Pathology of the Ear, 2nd Ed., Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1993.
3. Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: Evidence for feedback of outer
hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J. Neurosci. 1991; 11: 1057-1067.
4. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single neuron labeling and chronic cochlea pathology. III. Stereocilia
damage and alterations in threshold tuning curves. Hear. Res. 1984; 16: 54-74.
5. Troland LT. The psychophysiology of auditory qualities and attributes. J. Gen. Psych. 1929; 2: 28-58.
6. Shannon RV, Galvin JJ, 3rd, Baskent D. Holes in hearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2002; 3: 185-
199.
7. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory
Neurosci. 1997; 3: 289-311.
8. Moore BCJ, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcántara JI. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions
in the cochlea. Br. J. Audiol. 2000; 34: 205-224.
9. Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for
the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif. 2001; 5: 1-34.
10. Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications.
Ear Hear. 2004; 25: 98-116.
11. Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea at 4 kHz in elderly adults: relation to absolute
threshold, steepness of audiogram, and pure tone average. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2007; 18: 96-107.
12. Vinay, Moore BCJ. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and
Hearing 2007; 28: 231-241.
13. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear
Hear. 2004; 25: 478-487.
14. Pumplin J. Low-noise noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985; 78: 100-104.
15. Cairns S, Frith R, Munro KJ, Moore BCJ. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead
regions. Int. J. Audiol. 2007; 46: 575-584.
16. Vickers DA, Moore BCJ, Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for
people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001; 110: 1164-1175.
17. Baer T, Moore BCJ, Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for
people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002; 112: 1133-1144.
18. Simpson A, Hersbach AA, McDermott HJ. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental
nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int. J. Audiol. 2005; 44: 281-292.
19. Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M, Seewald R, Parsa V, Johnson A. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency
compression: Clinical outcomes. Int. J. Audiol. 2009; 48: 632-644.
20. Vinay, Moore BCJ. Speech recognition as a function of highpass filter cutoff frequency for subjects
with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
2007; 122: 542-553.
21. Vinay, Moore BCJ, Baer T. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff
frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008;
123: 606-609.
22. Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the
cochlear. Ear Hear. 2001; 22: 268-278.
23. Halpin C. The tuning curve in clinical audiology. Am. J. Audiol. 2002; 11: 56-64.
24. Vinay, Moore BCJ. Psychophysical tuning curves and recognition of highpass and lowpass filtered
speech for a person with an inverted V-shaped audiogram. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010; (submitted).
25. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Schlueter A. Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: Relevance for
combined electric and acoustic stimulation. In: van de Heyning P, Kleine Punte A, eds. Cochlear
Implants and Hearing Preservation. Advances in ORL, 67. Basel: Karger; 2009.
26. Vinay, Moore BCJ. TEN(HL)-test results and psychophysical tuning curves for subjects with auditory
neuropathy. Int. J. Audiol. 2007; 46: 39-46.
27. Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends Amplif. 2005;
9: 1-43.
28. Langenbeck B, Textbook of Practical Audiometry, London: Edward Arnold; 1965.
Correspondence can be addressed to Brian Moore, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of
Cambridge, England, e-mail: bcjm@cam.ac.uk

Interacoustics affinity 2.0 Specifications

General

Brand	Interacoustics
Model	affinity 2.0
Category	Medical Equipment
Language	English