EasyManua.ls Logo

Siemens SINAMICS G120D CU240D-2 DP - F01650 SI P1 (CU): Acceptance test required

Siemens SINAMICS G120D CU240D-2 DP
980 pages
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Next Page IconTo Next Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
To Previous Page IconTo Previous Page
Loading...
SINAMICS G120D
List Manual (LH14), 01/2016, A5E33842313
833
4 Faults and alarms
4.2 List of faults and alarms
F01650 SI P1 (CU): Acceptance test required
Message class: Safety monitoring channel has identified an error (10)
Reaction: OFF2
Acknowledge: IMMEDIATELY (POWER ON)
Cause: The drive-integrated "Safety Integrated" function on processor 1 requires an acceptance test.
Note:
This fault results in a STOP A that can be acknowledged.
Fault value (r0949, interpret decimal):
130: Safety parameters for processor 2 not available.
Note:
This fault value is always output when Safety Integrated is commissioned for the first time.
1000: Reference and actual checksum on processor 1 are not identical (booting).
- at least one checksum-checked piece of data is defective.
- safety parameters set offline and loaded into the Control Unit.
2000: Reference and actual checksum on processor 1 are not identical (commissioning mode).
- reference checksum incorrectly entered on processor 1 (p9799 not equal to r9798).
- when de-activating the safety functions, p9501 was not deleted.
2001: Reference and actual checksum on processor 2 are not identical (commissioning mode).
- reference checksum incorrectly entered on processor 2 (p9899 not equal to r9898).
- when de-activating the safety functions, p9501 was not deleted.
2002: Enable of safety-related functions between the processor 1 and processor 2 differ (p9601 not equal to p9801).
2003: Acceptance test is required as a safety parameter has been changed.
2004: An acceptance test is required because a project with enabled safety-functions has been downloaded.
2005: The Safety logbook has identified that a functional safety checksum has changed. An acceptance test is
required.
2010: Enable of safety-related brake control between the two monitoring channels differ (p9602 not equal to p9802).
2020: Error when saving the safety parameters for the processor 2.
9999: Subsequent response of another safety-related fault that occurred when booting that requires an acceptance
test.
Remedy: For fault value = 130:
- carry out safety commissioning routine.
For fault value = 1000:
- again carry out safety commissioning routine.
- replace the memory card or Control Unit.
- Using STARTER, activate the safety parameters for the drive involved (change settings, copy parameters, activate
settings).
For fault value = 2000:
- check the safety parameters on processor 1 and adapt the reference checksum (p9799).
For fault value = 2001:
- check the safety parameters on processor 2 and adapt the reference checksum (p9899).
For fault value = 2002:
- enable the safety-related functions on processor 1 and check processor 2 (p9601 = p9801).
For fault value = 2003, 2004, 2005:
- carry out an acceptance test and generate an acceptance report.
The fault with fault value 2005 can only be acknowledged when the "STO" function is de-selected.
For fault value = 2010:
- check the enable the safety-related brake control on both monitoring channels (p9602 = p9802).
For fault value = 2020:
- again carry out safety commissioning routine.
- replace the memory card or Control Unit.
For fault value = 9999:
- carry out diagnostics for the other safety-related fault that is present.

Table of Contents

Related product manuals